|
Post by picanyeo on May 10, 2012 18:36:08 GMT 8
It's usually done at Jurong West. You can call Joey to make an appointment.
|
|
|
Post by picanyeo on May 12, 2012 12:23:56 GMT 8
During the meetup last night, I have the opportunity to sit in one of the bro's QFR ride for a short spin. Thanks to the bro who let me have the ride.
I can feel that the low end has significantly increased. Although I did not sit in the same ride before QFR, but I can feel the responsiveness at the low end. BTW, it;s an AT transmission so low end improvement is really useful.. Add in RISK and it really makes a wonderful combination..
|
|
|
Post by bluemonster25 on May 12, 2012 21:49:31 GMT 8
o what about a manual transmission car?Low end also improved alot?
|
|
|
Post by picanyeo on May 12, 2012 22:31:02 GMT 8
I have not sat in a MT QFR ride last night. But the tuning applies to all vehicles regardless of transmission. I'm sure MT vehicles would get improvement in the low end too. It may even perform better than an AT due to lesser transmission losses..
In the first place, there are a lot of MT vehicles with QF.. All have given good reviews.
|
|
|
Post by bluemonster25 on May 13, 2012 9:21:03 GMT 8
Icic..uw any MT rides with QFR so far?haha
|
|
|
Post by picanyeo on May 13, 2012 9:23:33 GMT 8
I think bro khoo has QFR with MT pica. I think still have others but I can't remember.
|
|
|
Post by bluemonster25 on May 13, 2012 9:44:54 GMT 8
Icic..Wonder any bros with rio got QFR anot..haha
|
|
|
Post by Koch on May 13, 2012 12:08:43 GMT 8
Y dun u be e FIRST Rio to be QFR? Have a first feel of QFR on ur ride is better den wait n wait mah... Once u have done it, it surely answer all ur queries! Keke...
|
|
|
Post by picanyeo on May 13, 2012 14:33:46 GMT 8
Icic..Wonder any bros with rio got QFR anot..haha So do you have QF now? Or you are using stock mapping with RISK?
|
|
|
Post by bluemonster25 on May 13, 2012 14:42:58 GMT 8
Bro kelvin..I wanted to have..but currently no spare cash leh..haha..I'm waiting to dekit my muffler first..
|
|
|
Post by picanyeo on May 16, 2012 8:43:05 GMT 8
This is my third tank of petrol after QF. It reads 11.05km/ltr for this batch of petrol. Hence, I am able to conclude that QF does give petrol consumption improvements when driven at the same style. My throttle position is 20 - 30% for normal driving, 50% for overtaking. Fuel grade used is RON95. Previous average consumption is between 9.8 to 10.1km/ltr. My 3 tanks of petrol consumptions reads 11.5km/ltr, 11.05km/ltr (both normal driving) and 10.6km/ltr (slightly spirited). It's an increase of 1km/ltr.
|
|
qd
Gear ONE
Posts: 60
|
Post by qd on May 19, 2012 13:03:23 GMT 8
Thanks Joey for the QFR!!!
|
|
Harmony Motor
Motoring with Peace of Mind - Honesty, Sincerity and Integrity are our beliefs!
Posts: 1,761
|
Post by Harmony Motor on May 19, 2012 18:27:44 GMT 8
You are most welcomed. I am very happy that all my clients are very happy with QF and QFR. Cheers
|
|
danielkoh
Gear TWO
[N4:#@danielweijie######]
Posts: 183
|
Post by danielkoh on May 22, 2012 14:09:22 GMT 8
Icic..Wonder any bros with rio got QFR anot..haha I might be the first then. QFR enabled since beginning of May. 2009 Rio AT
|
|
|
Post by bluemonster25 on May 22, 2012 14:32:34 GMT 8
Icic..but urs is a AT rio..haha..Mine is MT..but I still think that AT is faster than MT..haha
|
|
|
Post by picanyeo on May 24, 2012 8:16:21 GMT 8
My 4th tank has a FC of 11.15km/ltr. So more or less my FC has stabilized at >11km/ltr, a 1km/ltr increase from stock. Going to try RON98 for 1 or 2 tanks to see if FC will improve. Now currently at RON95
|
|
|
Post by bluemonster25 on May 25, 2012 19:26:34 GMT 8
Btw,just 1 question, If I got QFR installed onto my ride now and in the future when I decided to change to another kia car, I will just do the transfer over. However, what about the RISK setup in the old ride?
|
|
|
Post by picanyeo on May 26, 2012 18:22:07 GMT 8
RISK can be transfer to the next ride. Labour fee will be required. I can't remember the amount, got to check with Roy on this..
A few points to note is that whether the new ride can be fitted with RISK and also if the hose is long enough for the new ride. The hose I'm refering to is the internal scoop.
|
|
|
Post by bluemonster25 on May 26, 2012 20:28:17 GMT 8
Okie dokie..Thanks!!
|
|
|
Post by picanyeo on May 29, 2012 14:52:37 GMT 8
4th tank after QF reads 10.95km/ltr. More or less confirm stable at 11km/ltr. Will not hit 10km/ltr if driving routes and conditions don't change..
|
|
|
Post by bluemonster25 on May 29, 2012 19:38:14 GMT 8
Btw,any idea where to get slotted discs for rio?
|
|
|
Post by picanyeo on Jun 2, 2012 22:49:19 GMT 8
In a list of parameters we can monitor from the ECU, which one affects FC most? Is it engine load?
In addition, how do we know the rpm range which an engine uses fuel most efficiently? For eg, changing gear at 2.5rpm generates better FC compared to 2rpm. Is it a trial and error thing or there are some parameters we can monitor?
|
|
|
Post by lionelstep on Jun 3, 2012 23:56:52 GMT 8
In a list of parameters we can monitor from the ECU, which one affects FC most? Is it engine load? In addition, how do we know the rpm range which an engine uses fuel most efficiently? For eg, changing gear at 2.5rpm generates better FC compared to 2rpm. Is it a trial and error thing or there are some parameters we can monitor? Theoretically, changing gears faster to the higher gear saves more fuel, and with more gentle RPM during gear change. Thus, changing gear with RPM at 2k should be more fuel saving than changing gear at 2.5k RPM.
|
|
|
Post by picanyeo on Jun 4, 2012 5:18:30 GMT 8
Theoretically, changing gears faster to the higher gear saves more fuel, and with more gentle RPM during gear change. Thus, changing gear with RPM at 2k should be more fuel saving than changing gear at 2.5k RPM. Well, I've done 2 tests before for my pica. By changing gears constantly at 2rpm for one test, and the other at 2.5rpm. The one at 2.5rpm achieves better mileage. I believe that although a vehicle at 2.5rpm uses more fuel than 2rpm, the engine performs more efficiently compared to 2rpm.
|
|
|
Post by lionelstep on Jun 5, 2012 1:05:46 GMT 8
Theoretically, changing gears faster to the higher gear saves more fuel, and with more gentle RPM during gear change. Thus, changing gear with RPM at 2k should be more fuel saving than changing gear at 2.5k RPM. Well, I've done 2 tests before for my pica. By changing gears constantly at 2rpm for one test, and the other at 2.5rpm. The one at 2.5rpm achieves better mileage. I believe that although a vehicle at 2.5rpm uses more fuel than 2rpm, the engine performs more efficiently compared to 2rpm. Thanks, read an article about tests conducted by US, a vehicle must quickly get to 80km/h after 15 seconds from stand still actually saves more fuel than slow pick up. Perhaps it explains well about your discovery.
|
|