|
Post by carbon81 on Jan 4, 2011 22:32:15 GMT 8
Hi all bros, do u guys would spend on N.A parts or Turbo kit?
From my experience N.A car when u take $10k to spend on N.A parts versus $6k on turbo kit and turns out turbo kit is much more worth it and more power.
Wat u guys think? Its purely a discussion hope i did not offend anyone out there.
|
|
Fιcκs
Gear THREE
Posts: 474
|
Post by Fιcκs on Jan 4, 2011 22:55:18 GMT 8
Turbo for me. Cost efficient and yields better results. End of the day, efficient.
|
|
|
Post by Lao Beng on Jan 5, 2011 9:31:17 GMT 8
the only problem is to de kit it when coming to inspection
|
|
|
Post by cee1071 on Feb 2, 2011 16:14:59 GMT 8
For me turbo anytime.....
|
|
|
Post by Lao Beng on Feb 3, 2011 12:18:38 GMT 8
So inspection time no need to take out the Turbo are you sure. Which inspection central will allow that.
|
|
|
Post by themostextreme on Feb 7, 2011 8:49:46 GMT 8
whao bro, don't sound so angry lah. by right : take out, inspect and put back. but beri troublesome babe!!!! not worth d effort. by left : po-heng-sway lor. hehehehe.....
|
|
Harmony Motor
Motoring with Peace of Mind - Honesty, Sincerity and Integrity are our beliefs!
Posts: 1,761
|
Post by Harmony Motor on Feb 9, 2011 0:25:58 GMT 8
Turbo for me. Cost efficient and yields better results. End of the day, efficient. Agree that it is the most efficient in terms of $/HP-Torque compares to any other mods. Eg. $4k for another 50 - 70 HP is very cheap. But not so efficient when it comes to up keeping it. Like maintenance, Fuel Consumption and worst of all, annual inspection!
|
|